Why Some Parents Choose Circumcision
Owing to changing views on the benefits of being ‘cut’, male circumcision rates are falling in the US.
However, some believe that male circumcision has benefits for both men and women as it may reduce the risk of at least three cancers (cancers of the penis and prostate in men, and cervical cancer in women), and is also said to hamper the spread of AIDS, chancroid and genital herpes in both men and women, and bacterial vaginosis and trichomoniasis in women.
Those who recommend circumcision note that it can help relieve balanitis and phimosis. Then there are religious considerations — many Jews and Muslims circumcise their sons owing to the faith-based requirements.
This article examines the reasons circumcision is still popular.
Cancer
A slight reduction in the risk of three cancers has been linked to male circumcision. If her partner is circumcised, a woman has a reduced risk of contracting the human papilloma virus (HPV), which is a major risk factor for cervical cancer. HPV infection is also found in about 50% of penile cancers, which is an extremely uncommon cancer. The reason HPV is partial to uncircumcised men is that the area under the foreskin provides warm, moist conditions, ideal for the growth of bacteria and the build-up of smegma — a combination of oily skin secretions and dead skin cells. This mucosal surface area, which is significantly reduced in circumcised men, is exposed during intercourse, permitting the transmission of HPV and other viruses.
With respect to prostate cancer, researchers at the University of Washington discovered that men who are circumcised before they had sex for the first time were 15% less likely to be afflicted with prostate cancer than their uncircumcised brethren, and 18% less likely to contract more aggressive forms of the disease. The findings led the researchers to believe that because circumcised men are less prone to get sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), they’re also less likely to suffer inflammation of the prostate which can, and sometimes does, trigger cancer because of abnormal cell growth. However, medical experts point out that this finding alone isn’t sufficient to recommend circumcision.
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
Three studies in Africa — in South Africa, Kenya and Uganda — appear to prove beyond doubt that male circumcision protects both men and women against contracting the HIV virus which causes AIDS. It doesn’t make men immune to the virus, of course, but being circumcised offers a far higher level of protection compared to the alternative. The first study, in South Africa’s Orange Farm township, found a 63% decrease in HIV infection among circumcised heterosexual men compared with their uncut brethren; the figure was a 48% decrease in Uganda and 53% in Kenya.
The obvious explanation is that the delicate foreskin can sometimes tear during sex, allowing HIV an easier passage from one body to the other. But there is another more complex explanation that has intrigued researchers — the foreskin is packed with white blood cells known as Langerhans cells which are designed to detect foreign substances called antigens. Because the HIV virus contains antigens it’s highly likely that, should a man’s foreskin tear and bleed during sex with a woman, his white blood cells will readily bind with the virus. Langerhans cells are supposed to trigger the body’s defenses but once HIV has entered the body, the immune system fails to repel it effectively. Removing the foreskin eliminates the perils presented by a concentration of Langerhans cells.
Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs)
Male circumcision can hamper the spread of several STDs such as chancroid and genetic herpes. It can also benefit women as it reduces their risk of contracting bacterial vaginosis and trichonomoniasis. Chancroid is a contagious but curable STD that causes ulcers on the genitals; it’s apparently on the decline and occurs only in sporadic outbreaks. If it causes scarring on an uncircumcised penis it can lead to phimosis, a condition in which the foreskin cannot be fully retracted over the penis head or glans.
The British National Health Service (NHS) says uncut men are 10 times more likely to contract chancroid than cut men, and twice as likely to get syphilis. The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) noted that heterosexual circumcised men are at significantly less risk of acquiring herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), the cause of genital herpes. Meanwhile, female partners of cut men are far less likely to get genital ulceration, bacterial vaginosis or trichomoniasis. Studies found that two anaerobic organisms found on uncut penises, Clostridiales and Prevotellaceae, are linked to vaginosis.
Balanitis and Phimosis
An uncomfortable skin condition known as balanitis causes swelling and redness on the head of the penis, and is more prevalent in uncut men. Occurring either acutely or chronically (lasting more than a few weeks), it results in a discharge which may obstruct the retraction of the foreskin and lead to phimosis, a condition in which scarring on the foreskin makes retraction extremely painful. If the condition worsens, it can block the urethra which in turn hinders urination and causes bladder infections. Anti-circumcision lobbyists note that phimosis isn’t necessarily a reason to get circumcised; indeed, phimosis can be treated with steroid cream and gentle stretching by the patient.
Religion
Circumcision is an important part of both Jewish and Muslim faiths. Judaism heeds a command from God to Abraham in the book of Genesis that all male children should be circumcised. This Covenant of Circumcision is observed by many Jews, even those who aren’t particularly religious, and is regarded as a sign of their agreement with God dating back more than 3,000 years. The requirement to be circumcised among Muslims isn’t as clear-cut as it is among Jews, but some regard the operation as mandatory. The main reason for Islamic circumcision is cleanliness and hygiene, and most boys undergo the operation before puberty, even though it isn’t mentioned in the Qur’an. As for Christians, circumcision isn’t stipulated as an obligation in the New Testament although Jesus, being a Jew, was circumcised.
All Reasons Why Parents Choose Circumcision… But…
Take it from someone that is uncut himself. Being uncircumcised in a world that is 80% uncircumcised is NOT a strangers game. Only in the U.S. is it deemed socially unacceptable to be against cutting. Many live perfectly healthy lives without it, and with it enjoy the heightened sensitivity that comes with it. The disease and STD studies are being re-evaluated now more than ever, but it is an understandable source of fear parents have, wanting to minimize their child’s risks in a world plagued by them… but…
can you keep your kid from skydiving, driving a car, or riding a bike, all so he’ll avoid harm?
is this fear truly justified? Leave your thoughts below, and be sure to answer the question…
Will you circumcise your son?
lee
July 2, 2015, 4:48 pmI am a 31 year old in Victoria Australia.
I was not circumcised as a baby & all thru my childhood & adolescent years I hated being uncut. It affected me in every area of my life including confidence, self esteem, sex/relationships & I never let any one see that I was uncut. If I was inevitably going to be seen I would wear my foreskin in the retracted position to look cut…
@ 20yrs old I had enough & got myself circumcised (cut)… this is the best thing I
ever did 4 my self!!!
Although some people try & say not many of us are cut, this is not true. 80% of
my peers are/were cut & @ places like public showers the number is similar
including males of all ages down to young children!
People also say sensitivity is lost. This is NOT true eighther! I have had it both
ways & have spent similar times as each while a sexually active adult. In FACT circumcision heightens sensitivity & makes the glans capable of receiving direct
stimulation & a greater range of feelings, as long as the penis is looked after like
skin any where else on the body with occasional application of hand lotion…
I believe all males should be circumcised shortly after birth, unless a medical condition prevents this, then they should be done as a child…
If I have sons they will be circumcised for a lifetime of benefits! There is no downside!!!
aus1
July 25, 2015, 9:47 pmI’m in my 4O’s
and believe the genital surgery should be banned on infants and children.
Compared to Euro cousins – they are healthier and have better more pleasant sex lives that us who were done in Australia or the USA. Only circs need lots of sex lub and had lotion – lets face it – it is and industry and it’s all about the money.
Circumcision should be left to adults – for those that want it (Provides temporary heightened sense – until the skin drys out as you age LOL! )
The Glans is not where the pleasure derives from (It’s a Pressure Pain sensor) stimulate the glans enough and it is not pleasurable – probably cause you to urinate. It is the inner skin and ridge band and what is left of frenum if you are unlucky to have a stupid parent decide to circumcise an infant.
There are so many down sides of IRC on boys it is not funny, Mutilation – botched operations. Needless inflicting pain suffering on an infant – all for only a cosmetic look – so your little boy can look like a turned on sex object.
I am so glad public Hostpitals now in Australia and parents have wised up to this mythical con as so many in my area are now left intact – whole THANK FULLY.
The USA is way behind in the mythical dark ages on this subject.
So if you have a baby boy – best thing you can do is leave it and him alone when it comes to genitals, nature knows best, best for him & bonding to mother with breast feeding.
You won’t have to be rubbing vasoline and pain releif oinments on his penis, lower risk of SID (Thats where most IRC boys that don’t make it end up on a register)
Won’t have Meatal stenosis – 99.9% caused by circ.
Less chance of kidney issues due to above or urine retention after Circ.
Won’t have surgery errors (any mistake is x3 magnified in a grown man)
No Difference in Penile cancer (Circ guy do get it at the scar – join area)
Won’t hate you as a parent.
Then there is also the pain inflicted which causes permanent brain changes
and if sever enough breathing apnoea etc. resulting in SIDS again.
Plus why would you wish to partially castrate a baby boy?
The whole crap came about to reduce masturbation and infact with the penis inside bits on the outside actually has either no effect or makes it worse.
Wisest move is to go with nature – as an adult if they are stupid enough can they do what they like anyway.
When one ages – one realises skin should be their to keep thinks moist and in good condition.